As far as I know it's ungrammatical to use the verb form "seeing" when perception is involved - do you mean specifically the gerund seeing, or any use of to see? Either way, it sounds wrong to this US English speaker: we use "seeing" to mean "perceiving" all the time. grammar - When is it ok to use "seeing"?
- English Language Learners ... However, I'm seeing two interpretations which are perfectly acceptable in correct English. These may not match the originally intent in the argument, but they're acceptable. Firstly, "see" can mean to determine something.
seeing stone, "I'll see who's at the door, and I'll see whether they're here about the car." Now consider the following exchange: It felt really nice seeing all the things fall together into place. Vs It felt really nice to see all the things fall together into place. Is this just an infinite- gerund thing? Or are the mean... They're definitely not interchangeable.
seeing stone, If you start saying I am seeing instead of I can see, people will notice you're talking like a foreigner. I can't explain how it works grammatically, but Chandler's use of the continuous here serves to convey the question: "do you the same thing I see?" See here for a similar use of see in the present continuous. present continuous - "I see" vs. "I am seeing" in the sense of ... (3) The debug option can be very helpful for seeing what, at first glance, looks like what a bunch of random characters does like. But this one is conventionally erroneous like the first one.
How to use the present participle of the verb to see. Can I say, "I enjoy seeing new places"?
